The Hoover closure continues to be the decision in search of a rationale. The few attempts to articulate one have a distinctly post-hoc feel to them. One of them is the idea that “there are too many schools close together without enough enrollment to support them.” To back up this assertion, closure proponents cite the district’s latest enrollment projections. Those projections show a precipitous thirty-four percent drop in the projected enrollment at Hoover, which would have, at one point, as few as 199 students!
Looking at those projections, you would think that a big chunk of Iowa City’s east side—an area filled with residential homes—was on its way to becoming a ghost town. Or is there another explanation?
Take a look at what Hoover’s enrollment projection looked like right before school board voted to close it (click to enlarge):
Yes, just two years ago, the district projected that Hoover’s enrollment would remain well above its capacity for the foreseeable future.
This year, almost two years after the closure vote, the district’s new enrollment projections for Hoover look like this:
That year when the district says that enrollment would be only 199? Right before the closure vote, that same projection was 376.
So you be the judge: Did the declining enrollment projection cause the closure decision, or did the closure decision cause the declining enrollment projection?